Mikrobiol. Z. 2019; 81(3):54-61.
An Influence of pH on Staphylococcal Biofilm Formation
Voronkova O.S., Voronkova Yu.S., Vinnikov A.I., Govorukha O.Yu., Shevchenko T.M.
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
72 Gagarin Ave., Dnipro, 49010, Ukraine
The study of the influence of the non-specific external factor – the acidity of the medium, revealed the dependence of the film forming processes on the intensity of the factor and time of it action. The aim of the research was to study an influence of acidity of nutrient media on biofilm formation of isolates of S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Methods. Isolates of S. aureus (n=7) and S. epidermidis (n=20) were inoculated on media with different pH (from 4.0 to 8.0) and cultivated 72 h. After 24, 48 and 72 h of cultivation the quantity of living cells was determined. Results. It has been shown that the maximal increase of cell number in films of S. aureus and S. epidermidis occurred in media with neutral pH, as well as the growth rates were closer to the maximum when the film was grown at pH 6 and 8. Thus, at neutral pH, the maximal cell growth took place for 72 h, when the number of cells in S. aureus film was 9.52±8.56 lgCFU/ml and S. epidermidis was 9.29±8.07 lgCFU/ml. At pH4 and 5, the intensity of the growth of the culture was the smallest: the maximal cell count in the film did not exceed 5.5 lgCFU/ml. Conclusion. The strains of S. aureus were more resistant to the influence of acidity of medium, compare to S. epidermidis isolates.
Keywords: biofilm formation, pH, staphylococci.
Full text (PDF, in English)
- Tan Y, Wang ZX, Marshall KC. Modeling pH effects on microbial growth: a statistical thermodynamic approach. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998; 59(6):724-731. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980920)59:6<724::AID-BIT9>3.0.CO;2-H
- Serhiychuk MH, Pozur VK, Vinnikov AI, Furzikova TM, Zhdanova NM. [Microbiology]. Kyiv: Kyiv University; 2005. Ukrainian.
- Vroom JM, De Grauw KJ, Gerritsen HC, Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD, Watson GK, Birmingham JJ, Allison C. Depth penetration and detection of pH gradients in biofilms by two-photon excitation microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65(8):3502-3511.
- Sun CQ, O'Connor CJ, Turner SJ, Lewis GD, Stanley RA, Roberton AM. The effect of pH on the inhibition of bacterial growth by physiological concentrations of butyric acid: Implications for neonates fed on suckled milk. Chem Biol Interact. 1998; 113(2):117-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2797(98)00025-8
- Li Y, Hu X, Ruan J, Arola DD, Ji C, Weir MD, Oates TW, Chang X, Zhang K, Xu HHK. Bonding durability, antibacterial activity and biofilm pH of novel adhesive containing antibacterial monomer and nanoparticles of amorphous calcium phosphate. J Dent. 2019; 81:91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.013
- D'Urzo N, Martinelli M, Pezzicoli A, De Cesare V, Pinto V, Margarit I, Telford JL, Maione D. Acidic pH strongly enhances in vitro biofilm formation by a subset of hypervirulent ST-17 Streptococcus agalactiae strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014; 80(7):2176-2185. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03627-13
- Pace JL, Rupp ME, Finch RG (eds). Biofilms, infection, and antimicrobial therapy. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420028232
- Welin-Neilands J, Svensäter G. Acid tolerance of biofilm cells of Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(17):5633-5638. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01049-07
- McNeill K, Hamilton IR. Effect of acid stress on the physiology of biofilm cells of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology. 2004; 150:735-742. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26482-0
- Nikitin OD. [The role of microbial biofilms in the pathogenesis of chronic infections of the urinary tract]. Zdorov'ye muzhchiny. 2013; 1(44):20-23. Russian.
- Rasamiravaka T, Randrianierenana AL, Raherimamdimby M, Andrianarisoa B. Effect of pH on biofilm formation and motilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC strains. BMR Microbiology. 2018; 4(1):1-5.
- Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath. PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST, eds. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, USA, 1994.
- Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH. Adherence of coagulasenegative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol. 1985; 22(6):996-1006.
- Deighton MA, Capstick J, Domalewski E, van Nguyen T. Methods for studying biofilms produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Methods Enzymol. 2001; 336:177-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(01)36589-8
- Agarwal A, Singh KP, Jain A. Medical significance and management of staphylococcal biofilm. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010; 58(2):147-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00601.x
- Nikolaev YuA, Plakunov VK. [Biofilm - «city of microbes» or an analogue of multicellular organisms?] Microbiology (Mikrobiologiya). 2007; 76(2):125-138. Russian. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261707020014
- Mokienko AV, Pushkina VA. [Biofilms and nosocomial infection: to an interrelation assessment]. Water: Hygiene and Ecology. 2013; 1(1):141-158. Russian.
- Simoes M, Bennett RN, Rosa EAS. Understanding antimicrobial activities of phytochemicals against multidrug resistant bacteria and biofilms. Natural Product Reports. 2009; 26(6):746-757. https://doi.org/10.1039/b821648g